{"id":335,"date":"2012-05-14T07:00:34","date_gmt":"2012-05-14T05:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.henle.de\/blog\/en\/?p=335"},"modified":"2015-06-18T16:20:09","modified_gmt":"2015-06-18T14:20:09","slug":"debussy-to-finger-or-not-to-finger%e2%80%a6-why-we-are-adding-fingering-in-the-%e2%80%9cetudes%e2%80%9d","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/2012\/05\/14\/debussy-to-finger-or-not-to-finger%e2%80%a6-why-we-are-adding-fingering-in-the-%e2%80%9cetudes%e2%80%9d\/","title":{"rendered":"Debussy: to finger or not to finger\u2026? Why we are adding fingering in the \u201c\u00c9tudes\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

In summer 1915 in the solitude of Pourville, the small seaside resort in Normandy, Claude Debussy finished his last major piano work, Douze \u00c9tudes pour le piano<\/em>. To the 12 etudes in the printed edition that appeared the following year, he prefixed a somewhat curious comment in his inimitable style. The French original<\/a> can be viewed in the Petrucci Library; here is the English translation:<\/p>\n

\n


\nA Few Words\u2026<\/strong>
\nThe present \u00c9tudes have no fingering \u2013 deliberately. Here, in brief, is the reason:
\nA predefined fingering cannot, obviously, suit all the many different shapes of hands. In modern editions this question is thought to be solved by superimposing several fingerings at once; this merely compounds the problem\u2026 The music then takes on the appearance of a strange undertaking that requires the fingers to proliferate by some inexplicable means\u2026
\nNor is the problem solved by the case of that precocious clavecinist Mozart who, being unable to strike all the notes of a chord, imagined he could take one of them with the tip of his nose. Was this perhaps merely the whim of an overly zealous compiler of fingering?
\nOur ancient masters \u2013 by which I mean in particular \u2018our\u2019 admirable clavecinists \u2013 never indicated any fingering, no doubt relying on the ingenuity of their contemporaries. It would be most improper to doubt this same capacity in modern virtuosi.
\nIn sum, the absence of fingering is an excellent exercise: it suppresses the spirit of perversity that compels us to abandon the fingering of the composer and vindicates those words of eternal wisdom, \u2018If you want something done well, do it yourself\u2019.
\nLet us find our own fingerings!
\nC. D.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

A clear statement, or so it seems \u2013 that is why we have received some critical comments regarding our Urtext edition of the \u00c9tudes<\/em><\/a> since they contain fingering (clearly indicated as supplementary, of course), like all our piano editions. Why are we taking on something that the composer himself had quite deliberately evaded?<\/p>\n

But we must take a somewhat closer look at the preface and the context in which it came about.\u00a0 The first question is how did it happen that Debussy advanced such a justification at all \u2013 there was after all no fingering in earlier piano cycles technically just as difficult, such as Estampes,<\/em> Images<\/em> or the Pr\u00e9ludes<\/em>. And in these he did not feel he had to make a disclaimer. Yet, in the case of the \u00c9tudes<\/em>, literally just \u2018exercise pieces\u2019 in spite of their superb, artistic content, Debussy seems to have sensed a stronger expectation that the edition have fingering \u2013 owing perhaps to the tradition of the genre and doubtless also coming from his publisher Jacques Durand. This was all the more so as Debussy had a major prototype directly in mind: At the start of 1915 he had re-edited for Durand the etudes by Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Chopin, which are copiously furnished with the composer\u2019s original fingering.<\/p>\n

So what to do?\u00a0 The ironic tone of voice in the introduction and his resort there to anecdotes and adages suggest that Debussy was more likely seeking an elegant way out of this, to him burdensome task, than that he was proposing a basic critique of the policy of adding fingering. The only solid argument seems to be his historical reference to \u2018our ancient, admirable clavecinists\u2019 \u2013 in so doing he invoked composers such as Jean-Philippe Rameau and especially Fran\u00e7ois Couperin whom Debussy had initially considered as dedicatee of his \u00c9tudes<\/em> (he opted ultimately, however, for Chopin). Was Debussy thus simply following a long French \u2018anti-fingering\u2019 tradition?<\/p>\n

Yet, it is just Couperin who in this respect stabbed Debussy in the back: In his manual L\u2019art de toucher le clavecin<\/em> (Paris 1716), Couperin goes at length into the technical side of cembalo playing and in detail into questions of correct fingering, particularly in the section \u2018Petite dissertation, sur la mani\u00e8re de doigter, pour paruenir a L\u2019intelligence des agr\u00e9mens qu\u2019on ua trouuer.\u2019 [\u2018Short treatise on methods of fingering for attaining an understanding of common ornamentation.\u2019] In another part he exemplifies numerous difficult-to-play passages from his Pi\u00e8ces de clavecin \u2026 premier livre <\/em>(Paris first edition, 1713) and specifies practical fingering for these:
\n\"\"<\/a>
\nFr. Couperin, L\u2019art de toucher le clavecin<\/em> (1716), p. 46<\/span><\/p>\n

We can see how important it obviously was to Couperin that precise attention be paid the fingering he offered there. Subsequently, he had an explicit reference inserted directly into the music text in a later issue of just that Premier livre<\/em>: \u2018Voy\u00e9s [sic] ma M\u00e9thode pour la maniere de doigter cet endroit. page 46.\u2019 [\u2018See my method, page 46, for the fingering of this passage.\u2019]
\n\"\"<\/a>
\nFr. Couperin, Pi\u00e8ces de clavecin \u2026 premier livre<\/em> (1713), p. 6<\/span><\/p>\n

Even in the case of Jean-Philippe Rameau\u2019s Pi\u00e8ces de Clavessin<\/em> (Paris, 1724), a glance at the title page already suffices to show that in it he was also paying attention to questions of playing technique. In a multi-page opening (\u2018De la mechanique des doigts sur le clavessin\u2019 [\u2018On the mechanics of fingering at the clavecin\u2019]) he treated in depth such topics as hand position, attack, correct finger position and its requisite fingering.
\n\"\"<\/a>
\nJ.-P. Rameau, Pi\u00e8ces de Clavessin<\/em> (1724), title page<\/span><\/p>\n

Thus, the \u2018old masters\u2019 Debussy invoked definitely emphasized pedagogical exemplification and did not seem to have all that much confidence in the \u2018competence of their contemporaries\u2019\u2026<\/p>\n

Now, to give Debussy posthumous tutoring in music history is not by any means our point \u2013 we only have to be careful not to over-interpret his rather facetiously casual aper\u00e7u<\/em> as a deep-rooted artistic credo and a virtual \u2018final intention\u2019. Incidentally, Debussy did indeed attend to the problem of suitable fingering for certain difficult passages, and several fingering solutions are also still to be found in the autograph draft of the \u00c9tudes<\/em>. Even in the printed edition Debussy did not always follow his own preface, as in the 6th<\/sup> \u00c9tude<\/em> \u2018Pour les huit doigts\u2019 [\u2018For the eight fingers\u2019]. Debussy explained in a footnote the restriction to only eight fingers in which he thus also implicitly specified a fingering for the execution of the 4-note group: \u2018In this etude, because of the continuously changing position of the hands, the use of the thumb is not convenient, and such an execution would become acrobatics.\u2019
\n\"\"<\/a>
\nC. Debussy, \u00c9tudes<\/em>, No. 6, m. 1\u20132<\/span><\/p>\n

But it is more than understandable that Debussy, already seriously ill at that time, would direct his whole time and working power to composing and completing his last sonata projects and not to \u2018secondary\u2019 activities such as systematically fingering the \u00c9tudes<\/em>. Extrapolating from this, that later editions likewise ought not include fingering suggestions seems to us, though, to be exaggerated piety. \u2018Cherchons nos doigt\u00e9s!\u2019 [\u2018Let us find our own fingerings!\u2019] \u2013 we have taken Debussy at his word and found ours: in our Urtext edition they are there only as a support, not as a prescription. You go ahead and find your own!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In summer 1915 in the solitude of Pourville, the small … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[279,465,3,322,349],"tags":[4,50,13,48,49,67,51],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}