{"id":6933,"date":"2022-10-31T08:00:39","date_gmt":"2022-10-31T07:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.henle.de\/blog\/en\/?p=6933"},"modified":"2024-10-15T09:41:55","modified_gmt":"2024-10-15T07:41:55","slug":"if-thats-not-reason-enough-to-celebrate-300-years-of-wtc-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.henle.de\/en\/2022\/10\/31\/if-thats-not-reason-enough-to-celebrate-300-years-of-wtc-i\/","title":{"rendered":"If that\u2019s not reason enough to celebrate: 300 years of WTC I!"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Title page of the WTC\u00a0I<\/em> autograph (D-B Mus.ms. Bach P 415<\/a>)<\/p><\/div>\n

2022 seems to be particularly rich in musical anniversaries: Even if for obvious reasons we let the notable birthdays of a John Williams or Elton John pass uncelebrated in this forum, the palette of our tributes this year already ranges from Kuhnau<\/a> through Brahms<\/a> and Franck<\/a> to Alexander Scriabin<\/a>. No doubt about it, all these composers have left a legacy of weighty works and occupy central positions in the Henle catalogue. But the jubilarian of today\u2019s blog post puts them all in the shade: Johann Sebastian Bach\u2019s Well-Tempered Clavier Part I<\/em>! This collection of 24 preludes and fugues, recorded by Bach in 1722 in an accurate fair copy with an elaborate title page, stating \u201c\u2026for the use and benefit of inquisitive young musicians\u2026and of those already well-versed in this study\u2026\u201d, accompanies practically everyone who has ever approached the piano for 300 years now. And, its history is just as eventful \u2013 also in the Henle publishing house, where it has now engaged us for over 70 years.<\/p>\n

But back to the year 1722: With his collection of \u201cPraeludia und Fugen durch alle Tone und Semitonia\u201d (Preludes and Fugues through all Tones and Semitones), readily abbreviated as WTC\u00a0I<\/em> in present-day professional circles, Bach was then reacting to efforts to achieve the tempered tuning of keyboard instruments still valid today, in which all the keys would sound equally good and could be played without any retuning. Intended both as practice material for acquiring pianistic skills and as a collection of examples for creatively penetrating counterpoint, the collection was initially addressed to Bach\u2019s own pupils and children. Numerous still extant copies by his pupils and by their pupils, in turn, attest to the work\u2019s widespread and lasting circulation during the composer\u2019s lifetime. But even afterwards, the WTC\u00a0I<\/em> \u2013 unlike many other compositions by the Thomaskantor \u2013 was not to fade into obscurity: To be found around the middle of the 18th<\/sup> century are copies offered in sales catalogues. Authors such as Friedrich Marpurg or Johann Philipp Kirnberger printed excerpts from it in their writings on music theory. Collectors such as Gottfried van Swieten included it in their libraries where the next generation of composers could study it \u2013 as impressively evidenced by copies, adaptations or epistolary statements by a Wolfgang Amad\u00e9 Mozart or Ludwig van Beethoven.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Title page of N. Simrock’s first edition (D-L\u00dch Mus S 116<\/a>)<\/p><\/div>\n

Whilst compiling Oeuvres completes<\/em> of the piano works of Mozart or Haydn, brought out by various publishing houses in serial collections from the mid-1790s onwards, publishing interest also turned to Bach. Around 1800, three firms \u2013 Hans Georg N\u00e4geli (Zurich), Nikolaus Simrock (Bonn) and the Bureau de Musique Hoffmeister & K\u00fchnel (Vienna\/Leipzig) \u2013 published in direct competition editions of the WTC\u00a0I<\/em>. These first prints were to be followed in the 19th century by a veritable flood of editions, with practically every self-respecting publishing house having (at least) one in its programme. In view of the collection\u2019s pedagogical importance, more and more pianists found themselves supplementing those parameters not established by Bach in his inscription, such as tempo, dynamics, fingering or phrasing, in editions specifically \u201cdesignated for the praxis\u201d. Carl Czerny\u2019s edition, published in 1837 by Peters in Leipzig, stood at the outset of this \u201cinstructive editions\u201d tradition that was to be enriched with ever increasing information on the performance and comprehension of the work during the second half of the 19th century by pianists and composers such as Carl Reinecke, Robert Franz or Ferruccio Busoni.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

The prelude in C Major (BWV 846) in Ferruccio Busoni’s edition<\/p><\/div>\n

In these editions it was obviously sometimes no longer quite clear in the music text what actually came from Bach and what from the editor \u2013 leading to the inevitable reaction that we associate today with the term Urtext<\/em>. Thus, as early as 1862, Franz Kroll presented Peters with a music text, free of (almost) all additions, that also formed the basis of his edition for the Alte Bach-Gesamtausgabe<\/em><\/a> (Old Bach Complete Edition), still considered today a milestone in Bach research. Further (more or less) text-critical editions by other publishers followed, always accompanied, of course, by the instructive editions that were so well received by the general public and remained on the market for generations.<\/p>\n

As is well known, precisely these designated editions were one of the central motivations for G\u00fcnter Henle<\/a>\u2019s founding of a publishing house in 1948 to focus exclusively on Urtext. And here, too, the WTC\u00a0I<\/em> was and still is of great importance: Published in 1950, it is included \u00a0amongst the first 10 titles in the Henle catalogue alongside piano works by Mozart, Beethoven and Schubert \u2013 and is still one of the publishing house\u2019s bestsellers. Otto von Irmer opened the preface to his edition with the programmatic statement:<\/p>\n

This edition, which is based on original autographs, restores to \u201cDas Wohltemperierte Klavier\u201d (\u201cThe well-tempered Clavier\u201d) the freedom of interpretation that Bach desired. For he never indicated tempo or dynamics but allowed both to develop freely from the inner content of the work. Any editorial additions of this kind would stultify the work and make it impossible to penetrate to the real essence of Bach\u2019s music.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Preface of the Irmer edition (1950)<\/p><\/div>\n

Determining this pure Urtext from the work\u2019s broad manuscript tradition was admittedly no easy task. For in three copies not only the contents of the collection but also Bach\u2019s handwriting was copied so well that the manuscripts were later erroneously assessed as other autograph manuscripts. So, until the 1950s, four autographs of WTC\u00a0I<\/em> were still assumed, with a large number of supposedly authorised variants extant that posed editorial problems of chronological classification and evaluation.<\/p>\n

Correspondence between the editor and G\u00fcnter Henle, filling several folders in the publishing-house archives, documents that the critical examination of the sources during ongoing consideration of current Bach research continued even after the edition\u2019s publication and was supported by external advisers. The latest findings were incorporated within each new issue of the WTC\u00a0I<\/em>: Assumed then in 1960, for example, was only one<\/em> autograph, which was privileged as the \u201cmost reliable source\u201d for the variants. On the other hand, more ornaments were included from Bach\u2019s direct milieu via his pupils\u2019 transcriptions, giving important clues to this music\u2019s contemporary performance practice.<\/p>\n

The text was repeatedly put to the test internally up to 1997, when the time was deemed ripe for a fundamental revision of the edition: Based on numerous new Bach research findings, editor Ernst-G\u00fcnter Heinemann<\/a> once again re-examined all the sources to present a new edition<\/a> with a preface<\/a> providing for the first time a detailed evaluation of the tradition and a commentary<\/a> classifying the variants by the work\u2019s different revision stages. At that time, the current issue of the Irmer edition served as the engraver\u2019s model for the new edition. Whilst the main music text remained virtually unaltered, the ornaments and variants were in great need of correction to bring the WTC\u00a0I<\/em> up to the current state of research \u2013 as is to be expected of the Henle Verlag\u2019s Urtext editions.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Left: engraver’s model for the revised edition; right: comment from the revised edition<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a>The practical aspect of his Urtext editions was also a particular concern of G\u00fcnter Henle\u2019s, which is why the publishing-house piano editions were furnished with fingering from the very outset. Here, too, the WTC\u00a0I<\/em> reflects different epochs in the publishing-house history: The 1950 edition was published with fingering by Walther Lampe<\/a>, a well-known pianist and respected teacher with whom G\u00fcnter Henle himself had had lessons in his younger years. As a close advisor to Henle, Lampe played an active role in the first publishing-house products and contributed important practical experience to the editions. In 1973 Lampe\u2019s fingering was replaced with a sparer version by Hans-Martin Theopold<\/a> in a new edition of the work. And, in 2007 no less a figure than Andr\u00e1s Schiff<\/a> was finally enlisted to ennoble the now published new edition with his practical playing indications. The celebrated Bach interpreter provides not only his well-considered fingering for the current edition of the WTC\u00a0I<\/em>, but also explains in a detailed preface<\/a> his ideas on shaping the sound of the work.<\/p>\n

The extensive correspondence amongst pianist, publishing-house director Wolf-Dieter Seiffert<\/a> and editor Ernst-G\u00fcnter Heinemann gives to this very day an insight into how intensively every detail was discussed before the edition\u2019s publication. The execution, for example, of the intricate arpeggio at the end of the D minor Prelude (mm. 25f.) was apparently discussed one evening, but not written down \u2013 which is why Wolf-Dieter Seiffert then asked maestro Schiff by email for \u2018a \u201cBach autograph\u201d from your hand\u2019 that would clarify the situation.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Left: m. 25f. of the prelude in d minor; right: comment<\/p><\/div>\n

Conversely, in a detailed letter on fingering questions, Schiff explains to the publishing-house editor Heinemann why he plays the repeated note at the end of the theme in the G-sharp minor fugue without changing fingers and illustrates his musical association at this point with the text underlay \u201cet incarnatus est\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Schiff to Heinemann, 5 August 2006<\/p><\/div>\n

[…this is my association. To articulate that you must not change the finger for the tone repetitions.]<\/p>\n

Well, does this pique your curiosity about our jubilarian WTC\u00a0I<\/em>? Then why not find out more about this interpretation in our edition by the great Bach interpreter… or just sit back and listen to its wonderful complete performance by Andr\u00e1s Schiff.<\/p>\n