Antonín Dvořák’s Cello Concerto op. 104 may be a special challenge for cellists, but for the editor of an Urtext edition it is a real nightmare. Not only – as so often with Dvořák – are there numerous differences between the score and first edition that are difficult to resolve. No, also showing up time and again even within the individual sources, especially in the solo part, are discrepancies and ambiguities, be they owing to multiple overwritings in the autograph or small dynamic and articulation variants between the individual printed part and the score or piano reduction. The engraver’s model for the first edition, which Dvořák himself wrote out in the autumn of 1895, would indeed be very helpful – but it is unfortunately lost. Appearing in New York a few years ago was an early copy of a separate solo part, apparently from Dvořák’s immediate milieu, that surprises in some places with precisely counted “blank measures”. Continue reading
Search
Subscribe2
-
Recent Posts
- ‘Le Maître des Charmes’ – On the 100th anniversary of Gabriel Fauré’s death
- The elders’ errors tenaciously persist. On the violin solo entry in Mozart’s D-major Violin Concerto, K. 218
- Arnold Schönberg on his 150th birthday – the truth in the music (and in the edition)
- If we hadn’t had the chance… the rediscovery of a new Prokofiev source
- Summer break
Tags
accidentals arrangements autograph Bach Bartók Beethoven Brahms Carnival Chopin Christmas clarinet Complete Edition Debussy Double bass Dvorak dynamics Fauré first edition Haydn Hoffmeister horn instrumentation Liszt Mendelssohn Mozart notation piano piano concerto piano sonata Rachmaninoff Ravel revision Saint-Saëns Schubert Schumann Scriabin string quartet urtext variant reading variants variations versions viola Violin Concerto Violin Sonata